Demographics details for Chowchilla, CA vs Southlake, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chowchilla, CA vs Southlake, TX.
| Data | Chowchilla | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,738 | 31,102 |
| Median Age | 34.1 years | 42.3 years |
| Median Income | $67,212 | $250,001 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Chowchilla vs Southlake
- The population in Southlake is higher at 31,102, compared to 18,738 in Chowchilla.
- The median age in Southlake is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 34.1 years in Chowchilla.
- Southlake has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $67,212 in Chowchilla.
- In Southlake, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 26.0% in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 0% in Southlake.
- The unemployment rate in Chowchilla is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.0% in Southlake.
Demographics
Demographics Chowchilla vs Southlake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chowchilla | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 1 |
| White | 29 | 68 |
| Asian | 6 | 17 |
| Hispanic | 48 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chowchilla vs Southlake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chowchilla at 6% compared to 1% in Southlake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Southlake at 68% compared to 29% in Chowchilla.
- In Southlake, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 6% in Chowchilla.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chowchilla at 48% compared to 9% in Southlake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chowchilla at 9% compared to 5% in Southlake.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chowchilla at 2% compared to 0% in Southlake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chowchilla | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 12.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 7.2% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 27.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chowchilla vs Southlake
- More residents in Chowchilla report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 12.8% in Southlake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chowchilla at 23.3% compared to 21.3% in Southlake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chowchilla at 18.3% compared to 8.4% in Southlake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Southlake at 19.4% compared to 13.7% in Chowchilla.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chowchilla at 36.7% compared to 27.1% in Southlake.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Chowchilla and Southlake at 7.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chowchilla | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (271) | 0.0% (15) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (2,738) | 4.2% (1,302) |
| Less than High School | 31.2% (5,842) | 1.3% (392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (1,731) | 46.0% (14,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chowchilla vs Southlake
- A higher percentage of residents in Chowchilla have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Southlake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chowchilla hold a high school diploma at 14.6% compared to 4.2% in Southlake.
- More residents in Chowchilla have less than a high school education at 31.2% compared to 1.3% in Southlake.
- In Southlake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.0% compared to 9.2% in Chowchilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.