Demographics details for Chowchilla, CA vs Oak harbor, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chowchilla, CA vs Oak harbor, OH.
Data | Chowchilla | Oak harbor |
---|---|---|
Population | 18,738 | 2,797 |
Median Age | 34.1 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $67,212 | $50,362 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Chowchilla vs Oak harbor
- In Chowchilla, the population is higher at 18,738, compared to 2,797 in Oak harbor.
- The median age in Oak harbor is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 34.1 years in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has a higher median income of $67,212 compared to $50,362 in Oak harbor.
- In Oak harbor, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 26.0% in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 8% in Oak harbor.
- The unemployment rate in Chowchilla is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Oak harbor.
Demographics
Demographics Chowchilla vs Oak harbor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chowchilla | Oak harbor |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | Data is updating |
White | 29 | 94 |
Asian | 6 | 1 |
Hispanic | 48 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 1 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chowchilla vs Oak harbor
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chowchilla at 6% compared to 0% in Oak harbor.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Oak harbor at 94% compared to 29% in Chowchilla.
- The Asian population is larger in Chowchilla at 6% compared to 1% in Oak harbor.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chowchilla at 48% compared to 4% in Oak harbor.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chowchilla at 9% compared to 1% in Oak harbor.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chowchilla at 2% compared to 0% in Oak harbor.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chowchilla | Oak harbor |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 12.3% |
Depression | 23.3% | 25.1% |
Smoking | 18.3% | 21.7% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 36.7% | 38.9% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chowchilla vs Oak harbor
- More residents in Chowchilla report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 18.4% in Oak harbor.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Oak harbor at 25.1% versus 23.3% in Chowchilla.
- Oak harbor has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 18.3% in Chowchilla.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Oak harbor at 18.4% compared to 13.7% in Chowchilla.
- Oak harbor has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 36.7% in Chowchilla.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Oak harbor at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Chowchilla.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chowchilla | Oak harbor |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (271) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.6% (2,738) | 19.1% (534) |
Less than High School | 31.2% (5,842) | 4.6% (130) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (1,731) | 13.3% (372) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chowchilla vs Oak harbor
- A higher percentage of residents in Chowchilla have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Oak harbor.
- In Oak harbor, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.1% compared to 14.6% in Chowchilla.
- More residents in Chowchilla have less than a high school education at 31.2% compared to 4.6% in Oak harbor.
- In Oak harbor, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.3% compared to 9.2% in Chowchilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.