Demographics details for Chowchilla, CA vs New haven, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chowchilla, CA vs New haven, CT.
| Data | Chowchilla | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,738 | 138,915 |
| Median Age | 34.1 years | 31.0 years |
| Median Income | $67,212 | $54,305 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 21.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Chowchilla vs New haven
- The population in New haven is higher at 138,915, compared to 18,738 in Chowchilla.
- Residents in Chowchilla have a higher median age of 34.1 years compared to 31.0 years in New haven.
- Chowchilla has a higher median income of $67,212 compared to $54,305 in New haven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chowchilla at 26.0% compared to 21.0% in New haven.
- The poverty level is identical in both Chowchilla and New haven at 19%.
- The unemployment rate in Chowchilla is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in New haven.
Demographics
Demographics Chowchilla vs New haven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chowchilla | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 29 |
| White | 29 | 27 |
| Asian | 6 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 48 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 9 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chowchilla vs New haven
- In New haven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 6% in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has a higher percentage of White residents at 29% compared to 27% in New haven.
- The Asian population is larger in Chowchilla at 6% compared to 5% in New haven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chowchilla at 48% compared to 30% in New haven.
- Both Chowchilla and New haven have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 9%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chowchilla at 2% compared to 0% in New haven.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chowchilla | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chowchilla vs New haven
- More residents in Chowchilla report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 16.0% in New haven.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chowchilla at 23.3% compared to 19.8% in New haven.
- New haven has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 18.3% in Chowchilla.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chowchilla at 13.7% compared to 13.0% in New haven.
- New haven has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 36.7% in Chowchilla.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New haven at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Chowchilla.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chowchilla | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (271) | 1.2% (1,674) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (2,738) | 15.7% (21,744) |
| Less than High School | 31.2% (5,842) | 15.1% (20,913) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (1,731) | 23.5% (32,679) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chowchilla vs New haven
- A higher percentage of residents in Chowchilla have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.2% in New haven.
- In New haven, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.7% compared to 14.6% in Chowchilla.
- More residents in Chowchilla have less than a high school education at 31.2% compared to 15.1% in New haven.
- In New haven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.5% compared to 9.2% in Chowchilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.