Demographics details for Chowchilla, CA vs Mansfield, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chowchilla, CA vs Mansfield, OH.
| Data | Chowchilla | Mansfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,738 | 47,865 |
| Median Age | 34.1 years | 38.9 years |
| Median Income | $67,212 | $40,996 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 6.8 |
Population Comparison: Chowchilla vs Mansfield
- The population in Mansfield is higher at 47,865, compared to 18,738 in Chowchilla.
- The median age in Mansfield is higher at 38.9 years, compared to 34.1 years in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has a higher median income of $67,212 compared to $40,996 in Mansfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chowchilla at 26.0% compared to 25.0% in Mansfield.
- Chowchilla has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 18% in Mansfield.
- Mansfield has a higher unemployment rate at 6.8% compared to 5.2% in Chowchilla.
Demographics
Demographics Chowchilla vs Mansfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chowchilla | Mansfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 19 |
| White | 29 | 69 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 48 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 8 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chowchilla vs Mansfield
- In Mansfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 6% in Chowchilla.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mansfield at 69% compared to 29% in Chowchilla.
- The Asian population is larger in Chowchilla at 6% compared to 1% in Mansfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chowchilla at 48% compared to 3% in Mansfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chowchilla at 9% compared to 8% in Mansfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chowchilla at 2% compared to 0% in Mansfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chowchilla | Mansfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 27.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 44.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chowchilla vs Mansfield
- More residents in Chowchilla report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 19.6% in Mansfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mansfield at 24.4% versus 23.3% in Chowchilla.
- Mansfield has a higher smoking rate at 27.4% compared to 18.3% in Chowchilla.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mansfield at 16.7% compared to 13.7% in Chowchilla.
- Mansfield has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 36.7% in Chowchilla.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mansfield at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Chowchilla.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chowchilla | Mansfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (271) | 1.0% (463) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (2,738) | 23.0% (11,014) |
| Less than High School | 31.2% (5,842) | 15.7% (7,522) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (1,731) | 11.2% (5,339) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chowchilla vs Mansfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Chowchilla have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.0% in Mansfield.
- In Mansfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 14.6% in Chowchilla.
- More residents in Chowchilla have less than a high school education at 31.2% compared to 15.7% in Mansfield.
- In Mansfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.2% compared to 9.2% in Chowchilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.