Demographics details for Chowchilla, CA vs Hollister, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chowchilla, CA vs Hollister, NC.
| Data | Chowchilla | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,738 | 847 |
| Median Age | 34.1 years | 34.3 years |
| Median Income | $67,212 | $39,913 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Chowchilla vs Hollister
- In Chowchilla, the population is higher at 18,738, compared to 847 in Hollister.
- The median age in Hollister is higher at 34.3 years, compared to 34.1 years in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has a higher median income of $67,212 compared to $39,913 in Hollister.
- In Hollister, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 26.0% in Chowchilla.
- The poverty level is higher in Hollister at 20%, compared to 19% in Chowchilla.
- The unemployment rate in Chowchilla is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Hollister.
Demographics
Demographics Chowchilla vs Hollister provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chowchilla | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 16 |
| White | 29 | 21 |
| Asian | 6 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 48 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 13 |
| American Indian | 2 | 41 |
Demographics Comparison: Chowchilla vs Hollister
- In Hollister, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 6% in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has a higher percentage of White residents at 29% compared to 21% in Hollister.
- The Asian population is larger in Chowchilla at 6% compared to 5% in Hollister.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chowchilla at 48% compared to 4% in Hollister.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hollister at 13%, compared to 9% in Chowchilla.
- In Hollister, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 41%, compared to 2% in Chowchilla.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chowchilla | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 21.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 18.1% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 31.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chowchilla vs Hollister
- In Hollister, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 20.9% in Chowchilla.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hollister at 24.6% versus 23.3% in Chowchilla.
- Hollister has a higher smoking rate at 31.3% compared to 18.3% in Chowchilla.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hollister at 14.9% compared to 13.7% in Chowchilla.
- Hollister has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 36.7% in Chowchilla.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hollister at 25.0% compared to 7.0% in Chowchilla.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chowchilla | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (271) | 3.9% (33) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (2,738) | 21.0% (178) |
| Less than High School | 31.2% (5,842) | 12.3% (104) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (1,731) | 10.7% (91) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chowchilla vs Hollister
- In Hollister, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 1.4% in Chowchilla.
- In Hollister, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.0% compared to 14.6% in Chowchilla.
- More residents in Chowchilla have less than a high school education at 31.2% compared to 12.3% in Hollister.
- In Hollister, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.7% compared to 9.2% in Chowchilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.