Demographics details for Chowchilla, CA vs Elm city, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chowchilla, CA vs Elm city, NC.
| Data | Chowchilla | Elm city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,738 | 1,204 |
| Median Age | 34.1 years | 48.0 years |
| Median Income | $67,212 | $48,125 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Chowchilla vs Elm city
- In Chowchilla, the population is higher at 18,738, compared to 1,204 in Elm city.
- The median age in Elm city is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 34.1 years in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has a higher median income of $67,212 compared to $48,125 in Elm city.
- In Elm city, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 26.0% in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 15% in Elm city.
- The unemployment rate in Chowchilla is higher at 5.2%, compared to 5.1% in Elm city.
Demographics
Demographics Chowchilla vs Elm city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chowchilla | Elm city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 60 |
| White | 29 | 25 |
| Asian | 6 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 48 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 1 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chowchilla vs Elm city
- In Elm city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 60% compared to 6% in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has a higher percentage of White residents at 29% compared to 25% in Elm city.
- The Asian population is larger in Chowchilla at 6% compared to 3% in Elm city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chowchilla at 48% compared to 11% in Elm city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chowchilla at 9% compared to 1% in Elm city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chowchilla at 2% compared to 0% in Elm city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chowchilla | Elm city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 37.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chowchilla vs Elm city
- More residents in Chowchilla report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 16.8% in Elm city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chowchilla at 23.3% compared to 21.2% in Elm city.
- Elm city has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 18.3% in Chowchilla.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Elm city at 15.7% compared to 13.7% in Chowchilla.
- Elm city has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 36.7% in Chowchilla.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Elm city at 19.0% compared to 7.0% in Chowchilla.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chowchilla | Elm city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (271) | 0.7% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (2,738) | 24.1% (290) |
| Less than High School | 31.2% (5,842) | 15.1% (182) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (1,731) | 11.5% (139) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chowchilla vs Elm city
- A higher percentage of residents in Chowchilla have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Elm city.
- In Elm city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.1% compared to 14.6% in Chowchilla.
- More residents in Chowchilla have less than a high school education at 31.2% compared to 15.1% in Elm city.
- In Elm city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.5% compared to 9.2% in Chowchilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.