Demographics details for Chowchilla, CA vs Aulander, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chowchilla, CA vs Aulander, NC.
| Data | Chowchilla | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,738 | 727 |
| Median Age | 34.1 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $67,212 | $33,250 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Chowchilla vs Aulander
- In Chowchilla, the population is higher at 18,738, compared to 727 in Aulander.
- The median age in Aulander is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 34.1 years in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has a higher median income of $67,212 compared to $33,250 in Aulander.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chowchilla at 26.0% compared to 23.0% in Aulander.
- Chowchilla has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 14% in Aulander.
- Aulander has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 5.2% in Chowchilla.
Demographics
Demographics Chowchilla vs Aulander provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chowchilla | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 61 |
| White | 29 | 38 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 48 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 1 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chowchilla vs Aulander
- In Aulander, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 6% in Chowchilla.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Aulander at 38% compared to 29% in Chowchilla.
- The Asian population is larger in Chowchilla at 6% compared to 0% in Aulander.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chowchilla at 48% compared to 0% in Aulander.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chowchilla at 9% compared to 1% in Aulander.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chowchilla at 2% compared to 0% in Aulander.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chowchilla | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chowchilla vs Aulander
- More residents in Chowchilla report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 19.2% in Aulander.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Aulander at 23.5% versus 23.3% in Chowchilla.
- Aulander has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 18.3% in Chowchilla.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Aulander at 14.2% compared to 13.7% in Chowchilla.
- Aulander has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 36.7% in Chowchilla.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Aulander at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Chowchilla.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chowchilla | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (271) | 0.4% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (2,738) | 13.3% (97) |
| Less than High School | 31.2% (5,842) | 28.5% (207) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (1,731) | 2.9% (21) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chowchilla vs Aulander
- A higher percentage of residents in Chowchilla have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.4% in Aulander.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chowchilla hold a high school diploma at 14.6% compared to 13.3% in Aulander.
- More residents in Chowchilla have less than a high school education at 31.2% compared to 28.5% in Aulander.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chowchilla hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 2.9% in Aulander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.