Demographics details for Chino, CA vs Interlachen, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chino, CA vs Interlachen, FL.
| Data | Chino | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,140 | 1,457 |
| Median Age | 36.9 years | 48.6 years |
| Median Income | $99,385 | $50,776 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Chino vs Interlachen
- In Chino, the population is higher at 93,140, compared to 1,457 in Interlachen.
- The median age in Interlachen is higher at 48.6 years, compared to 36.9 years in Chino.
- Chino has a higher median income of $99,385 compared to $50,776 in Interlachen.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chino at 40.0% compared to 39.0% in Interlachen.
- The poverty level is identical in both Chino and Interlachen at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Chino is higher at 4.6%, compared to 4.5% in Interlachen.
Demographics
Demographics Chino vs Interlachen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chino | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 11 |
| White | 4 | 37 |
| Asian | 18 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 53 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chino vs Interlachen
- In Interlachen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 7% in Chino.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Interlachen at 37% compared to 4% in Chino.
- The Asian population is larger in Chino at 18% compared to 0% in Interlachen.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chino at 53% compared to 34% in Interlachen.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Interlachen at 18%, compared to 17% in Chino.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chino at 1% compared to 0% in Interlachen.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chino | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 16.7% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 24.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 35.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chino vs Interlachen
- In Interlachen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.2% in Chino.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Interlachen at 20.3% versus 16.7% in Chino.
- Interlachen has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 11.3% in Chino.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Interlachen at 16.7% compared to 16.0% in Chino.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chino at 35.6% compared to 35.5% in Interlachen.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Interlachen at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Chino.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chino | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (1,483) | 2.0% (29) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (12,268) | 22.0% (320) |
| Less than High School | 20.1% (18,697) | 41.7% (607) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (17,626) | 10.4% (151) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chino vs Interlachen
- In Interlachen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.6% in Chino.
- In Interlachen, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 13.2% in Chino.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Interlachen at 41.7%, compared to 20.1% in Chino.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chino hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 10.4% in Interlachen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.