Demographics details for Chino, CA vs Cranberry township, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chino, CA vs Cranberry township, PA.

Data Chino Cranberry township
Population 93,140 31,560
Median Age 36.9 years 41.0 years
Median Income $99,385 $100,000
Married Families 40.0% 72.0%
Poverty Level 12% 4%
Unemployment Rate 4.6 3.2

Population Comparison: Chino vs Cranberry township

  • In Chino, the population is higher at 93,140, compared to 31,560 in Cranberry township.
  • The median age in Cranberry township is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 36.9 years in Chino.
  • Cranberry township has a higher median income of $100,000, compared to $99,385 in Chino.
  • In Cranberry township, the percentage of married families is higher at 72.0%, compared to 40.0% in Chino.
  • Chino has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 4% in Cranberry township.
  • The unemployment rate in Chino is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.2% in Cranberry township.

Demographics

Demographics Chino vs Cranberry township provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chino Cranberry township
Black 7 3
White 4 90
Asian 18 4
Hispanic 53 2
Two or More Races 17 1
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Chino vs Cranberry township

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chino at 7% compared to 3% in Cranberry township.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cranberry township at 90% compared to 4% in Chino.
  • The Asian population is larger in Chino at 18% compared to 4% in Cranberry township.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Chino at 53% compared to 2% in Cranberry township.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Chino at 17% compared to 1% in Cranberry township.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chino at 1% compared to 0% in Cranberry township.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chino Cranberry township
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% Data is updating%
Depression 16.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 11.3% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.0% Data is updating%
Obesity 35.6% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 7.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chino vs Cranberry township

  • More residents in Chino report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Chino at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Chino at 11.3% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Chino at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Chino at 35.6% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Chino at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chino Cranberry township
No Schooling 1.6% (1,483) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 13.2% (12,268) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 20.1% (18,697) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.9% (17,626) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Chino vs Cranberry township

  • A higher percentage of residents in Chino have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chino hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • More residents in Chino have less than a high school education at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chino hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.