Demographics details for Chino hills, CA vs Giddings, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chino hills, CA vs Giddings, TX.
| Data | Chino hills | Giddings |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,949 | 5,129 |
| Median Age | 39.4 years | 40.2 years |
| Median Income | $117,548 | $63,529 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Chino hills vs Giddings
- In Chino hills, the population is higher at 77,949, compared to 5,129 in Giddings.
- The median age in Giddings is higher at 40.2 years, compared to 39.4 years in Chino hills.
- Chino hills has a higher median income of $117,548 compared to $63,529 in Giddings.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chino hills at 47.0% compared to 34.0% in Giddings.
- The poverty level is higher in Giddings at 10%, compared to 8% in Chino hills.
- Giddings has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Chino hills.
Demographics
Demographics Chino hills vs Giddings provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chino hills | Giddings |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 11 |
| White | 14 | 24 |
| Asian | 40 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 29 | 48 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Chino hills vs Giddings
- In Giddings, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 4% in Chino hills.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Giddings at 24% compared to 14% in Chino hills.
- The Asian population is larger in Chino hills at 40% compared to 1% in Giddings.
- Giddings has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 29% in Chino hills.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chino hills at 13% compared to 12% in Giddings.
- In Giddings, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Chino hills.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chino hills | Giddings |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 14.6% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 7.9% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 28.4% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chino hills vs Giddings
- In Giddings, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 12.7% in Chino hills.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Giddings at 23.2% versus 14.6% in Chino hills.
- Giddings has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 7.9% in Chino hills.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Giddings at 16.8% compared to 15.3% in Chino hills.
- Giddings has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 28.4% in Chino hills.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Giddings at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Chino hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chino hills | Giddings |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (849) | 1.0% (53) |
| High School Diploma | 9.6% (7,450) | 26.1% (1,341) |
| Less than High School | 7.2% (5,599) | 22.3% (1,143) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.4% (26,814) | 8.8% (453) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chino hills vs Giddings
- A higher percentage of residents in Chino hills have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 1.0% in Giddings.
- In Giddings, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.1% compared to 9.6% in Chino hills.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Giddings at 22.3%, compared to 7.2% in Chino hills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chino hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 8.8% in Giddings.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.