Demographics details for Chino hills, CA vs Garden city, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chino hills, CA vs Garden city, KS.

Data Chino hills Garden city
Population 77,949 27,519
Median Age 39.4 years 32.3 years
Median Income $117,548 $67,500
Married Families 47.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 8% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Chino hills vs Garden city

  • In Chino hills, the population is higher at 77,949, compared to 27,519 in Garden city.
  • Residents in Chino hills have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 32.3 years in Garden city.
  • Chino hills has a higher median income of $117,548 compared to $67,500 in Garden city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Chino hills at 47.0% compared to 37.0% in Garden city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Garden city at 12%, compared to 8% in Chino hills.
  • The unemployment rate in Chino hills is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Garden city.

Demographics

Demographics Chino hills vs Garden city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chino hills Garden city
Black 4 6
White 14 16
Asian 40 5
Hispanic 29 55
Two or More Races 13 18
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Chino hills vs Garden city

  • In Garden city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 4% in Chino hills.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Garden city at 16% compared to 14% in Chino hills.
  • The Asian population is larger in Chino hills at 40% compared to 5% in Garden city.
  • Garden city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 29% in Chino hills.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Garden city at 18%, compared to 13% in Chino hills.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chino hills and Garden city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chino hills Garden city
Mental Health Not Good 12.7% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 11.8%
Depression 14.6% 18.2%
Smoking 7.9% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 15.3% 17.7%
Obesity 28.4% 38.7%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chino hills vs Garden city

  • In Garden city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 12.7% in Chino hills.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Garden city at 18.2% versus 14.6% in Chino hills.
  • Garden city has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 7.9% in Chino hills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Garden city at 17.7% compared to 15.3% in Chino hills.
  • Garden city has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 28.4% in Chino hills.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Garden city at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Chino hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chino hills Garden city
No Schooling 1.1% (849) 3.5% (967)
High School Diploma 9.6% (7,450) 10.9% (2,993)
Less than High School 7.2% (5,599) 34.9% (9,615)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 34.4% (26,814) 11.0% (3,034)

Education Levels Comparison: Chino hills vs Garden city

  • In Garden city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 1.1% in Chino hills.
  • In Garden city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.9% compared to 9.6% in Chino hills.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Garden city at 34.9%, compared to 7.2% in Chino hills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chino hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 11.0% in Garden city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.