Demographics details for Chickasha, OK vs Woodstock, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chickasha, OK vs Woodstock, VA.
| Data | Chickasha | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,549 | 5,907 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 38.4 years |
| Median Income | $55,136 | $64,470 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Chickasha vs Woodstock
- In Chickasha, the population is higher at 16,549, compared to 5,907 in Woodstock.
- The median age in Woodstock is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $64,470, compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chickasha at 34.0% compared to 32.0% in Woodstock.
- Chickasha has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 10% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Chickasha is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Chickasha vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chickasha | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 6 |
| White | 71 | 60 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chickasha vs Woodstock
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Chickasha and Woodstock at 6%.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 60% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Chickasha.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 8% in Chickasha.
- Both Chickasha and Woodstock have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chickasha at 4% compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chickasha | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chickasha vs Woodstock
- More residents in Chickasha report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.9% in Woodstock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chickasha at 25.4% compared to 24.9% in Woodstock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chickasha at 21.8% compared to 18.2% in Woodstock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodstock at 16.2% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chickasha at 40.8% compared to 38.9% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodstock at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Chickasha.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chickasha | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 2.0% (118) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (3,730) | 19.0% (1,121) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (2,160) | 17.2% (1,018) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (2,066) | 16.4% (968) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chickasha vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 19.0% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodstock at 17.2%, compared to 13.1% in Chickasha.
- In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.