Demographics details for Chickasha, OK vs Woodacre, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chickasha, OK vs Woodacre, CA.
Data | Chickasha | Woodacre |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,549 | 1,389 |
Median Age | 36.4 years | 61.2 years |
Median Income | $55,136 | $144,632 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 61.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: Chickasha vs Woodacre
- In Chickasha, the population is higher at 16,549, compared to 1,389 in Woodacre.
- The median age in Woodacre is higher at 61.2 years, compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Woodacre has a higher median income of $144,632, compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
- In Woodacre, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 0% in Woodacre.
- The unemployment rate in Chickasha is higher at 3.2%, compared to 0.0% in Woodacre.
Demographics
Demographics Chickasha vs Woodacre provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chickasha | Woodacre |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | Data is updating |
White | 71 | 90 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 11 | 10 |
American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chickasha vs Woodacre
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chickasha at 6% compared to 0% in Woodacre.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodacre at 90% compared to 71% in Chickasha.
- Both Chickasha and Woodacre have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chickasha at 8% compared to 0% in Woodacre.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chickasha at 11% compared to 10% in Woodacre.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chickasha at 4% compared to 0% in Woodacre.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chickasha | Woodacre |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 9.0% |
Depression | 25.4% | 19.5% |
Smoking | 21.8% | 10.4% |
Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 40.8% | 23.9% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chickasha vs Woodacre
- More residents in Chickasha report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 14.8% in Woodacre.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chickasha at 25.4% compared to 19.5% in Woodacre.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chickasha at 21.8% compared to 10.4% in Woodacre.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodacre at 18.2% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chickasha at 40.8% compared to 23.9% in Woodacre.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodacre.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chickasha | Woodacre |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 22.5% (3,730) | 4.4% (61) |
Less than High School | 13.1% (2,160) | 3.9% (54) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (2,066) | 60.8% (845) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chickasha vs Woodacre
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Woodacre.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 4.4% in Woodacre.
- More residents in Chickasha have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 3.9% in Woodacre.
- In Woodacre, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 60.8% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.