Demographics details for Chickasha, OK vs Rockford, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chickasha, OK vs Rockford, IL.
Data | Chickasha | Rockford |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,549 | 146,713 |
Median Age | 36.4 years | 37.5 years |
Median Income | $55,136 | $50,744 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 7.6 |
Population Comparison: Chickasha vs Rockford
- The population in Rockford is higher at 146,713, compared to 16,549 in Chickasha.
- The median age in Rockford is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher median income of $55,136 compared to $50,744 in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chickasha at 34.0% compared to 32.0% in Rockford.
- The poverty level is higher in Rockford at 20%, compared to 17% in Chickasha.
- Rockford has a higher unemployment rate at 7.6% compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Chickasha vs Rockford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chickasha | Rockford |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 22 |
White | 71 | 46 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 8 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chickasha vs Rockford
- In Rockford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 6% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 46% in Rockford.
- In Rockford, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Chickasha.
- Rockford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 8% in Chickasha.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chickasha at 11% compared to 9% in Rockford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chickasha at 4% compared to 0% in Rockford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chickasha | Rockford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 13.9% |
Depression | 25.4% | 21.0% |
Smoking | 21.8% | 21.2% |
Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 40.8% | 44.3% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chickasha vs Rockford
- More residents in Chickasha report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.0% in Rockford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chickasha at 25.4% compared to 21.0% in Rockford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chickasha at 21.8% compared to 21.2% in Rockford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rockford at 14.8% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Rockford has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 40.8% in Chickasha.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Rockford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chickasha | Rockford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 1.2% (1,781) |
High School Diploma | 22.5% (3,730) | 16.4% (24,126) |
Less than High School | 13.1% (2,160) | 17.1% (25,088) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (2,066) | 15.5% (22,792) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chickasha vs Rockford
- In Rockford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 16.4% in Rockford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rockford at 17.1%, compared to 13.1% in Chickasha.
- In Rockford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.