Demographics details for Chickasha, OK vs Redford, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chickasha, OK vs Redford, MI.
Data | Chickasha | Redford |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,549 | 46,899 |
Median Age | 36.4 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $55,136 | $59,000 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 57.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Chickasha vs Redford
- The population in Redford is higher at 46,899, compared to 16,549 in Chickasha.
- The median age in Redford is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Redford has a higher median income of $59,000, compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
- In Redford, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 10% in Redford.
- Redford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Chickasha vs Redford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chickasha | Redford |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 17 |
White | 71 | 74 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 8 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
American Indian | 4 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chickasha vs Redford
- In Redford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 6% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Redford at 74% compared to 71% in Chickasha.
- In Redford, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Chickasha.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chickasha at 8% compared to 5% in Redford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chickasha at 11% compared to 5% in Redford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chickasha at 4% compared to 1% in Redford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chickasha | Redford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 25.4% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 21.8% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 13.8% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 40.8% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chickasha vs Redford
- More residents in Chickasha report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chickasha at 25.4% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chickasha at 21.8% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chickasha at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chickasha at 40.8% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chickasha | Redford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 22.5% (3,730) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 13.1% (2,160) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (2,066) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chickasha vs Redford
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- More residents in Chickasha have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.