Demographics details for Chickasha, OK vs Moberly, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chickasha, OK vs Moberly, MO.
| Data | Chickasha | Moberly |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,549 | 13,774 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $55,136 | $39,332 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Chickasha vs Moberly
- In Chickasha, the population is higher at 16,549, compared to 13,774 in Moberly.
- The median age in Moberly is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher median income of $55,136 compared to $39,332 in Moberly.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chickasha at 34.0% compared to 27.0% in Moberly.
- Chickasha has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 13% in Moberly.
- Moberly has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Chickasha vs Moberly provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chickasha | Moberly |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 9 |
| White | 71 | 81 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chickasha vs Moberly
- In Moberly, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 6% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Moberly at 81% compared to 71% in Chickasha.
- In Moberly, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Chickasha.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chickasha at 8% compared to 3% in Moberly.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chickasha at 11% compared to 6% in Moberly.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chickasha at 4% compared to 0% in Moberly.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chickasha | Moberly |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 24.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 44.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chickasha vs Moberly
- In Moberly, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 19.1% in Chickasha.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Moberly at 26.1% versus 25.4% in Chickasha.
- Moberly has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 21.8% in Chickasha.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Moberly at 16.6% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Moberly has higher obesity rates at 44.1% compared to 40.8% in Chickasha.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Moberly.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chickasha | Moberly |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 1.0% (132) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (3,730) | 22.9% (3,149) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (2,160) | 14.7% (2,021) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (2,066) | 11.0% (1,514) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chickasha vs Moberly
- In Moberly, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- In Moberly, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.9% compared to 22.5% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Moberly at 14.7%, compared to 13.1% in Chickasha.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 11.0% in Moberly.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.