Demographics details for Chickasha, OK vs Lodge, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chickasha, OK vs Lodge, SC.
| Data | Chickasha | Lodge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,549 | 84 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $55,136 | $34,938 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Chickasha vs Lodge
- In Chickasha, the population is higher at 16,549, compared to 84 in Lodge.
- The median age in Lodge is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher median income of $55,136 compared to $34,938 in Lodge.
- In Lodge, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 15% in Lodge.
- Lodge has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Chickasha vs Lodge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chickasha | Lodge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 5 |
| White | 71 | 34 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 61 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chickasha vs Lodge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chickasha at 6% compared to 5% in Lodge.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 34% in Lodge.
- Both Chickasha and Lodge have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Lodge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 61%, compared to 8% in Chickasha.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chickasha at 11% compared to 0% in Lodge.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chickasha at 4% compared to 0% in Lodge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chickasha | Lodge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 45.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chickasha vs Lodge
- More residents in Chickasha report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.5% in Lodge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chickasha at 25.4% compared to 22.4% in Lodge.
- Lodge has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 21.8% in Chickasha.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lodge at 16.0% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chickasha at 40.8% compared to 34.9% in Lodge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lodge at 45.0% compared to 18.0% in Chickasha.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chickasha | Lodge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (3,730) | 60.7% (51) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (2,160) | 26.2% (22) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (2,066) | 8.3% (7) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chickasha vs Lodge
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Lodge.
- In Lodge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 60.7% compared to 22.5% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lodge at 26.2%, compared to 13.1% in Chickasha.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 8.3% in Lodge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.