Demographics details for Chickasha, OK vs Hobart, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chickasha, OK vs Hobart, IN.
| Data | Chickasha | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,549 | 29,458 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $55,136 | $69,398 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Chickasha vs Hobart
- The population in Hobart is higher at 29,458, compared to 16,549 in Chickasha.
- The median age in Hobart is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Hobart has a higher median income of $69,398, compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
- In Hobart, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 8% in Hobart.
- Hobart has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Chickasha vs Hobart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chickasha | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 11 |
| White | 71 | 63 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 7 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chickasha vs Hobart
- In Hobart, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 6% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 63% in Hobart.
- In Hobart, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Chickasha.
- Hobart has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 8% in Chickasha.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chickasha at 11% compared to 7% in Hobart.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chickasha at 4% compared to 0% in Hobart.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chickasha | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chickasha vs Hobart
- More residents in Chickasha report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.5% in Hobart.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chickasha at 25.4% compared to 24.5% in Hobart.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chickasha at 21.8% compared to 18.6% in Hobart.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hobart at 18.9% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chickasha at 40.8% compared to 38.1% in Hobart.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Hobart.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chickasha | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 0.7% (217) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (3,730) | 24.5% (7,227) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (2,160) | 8.2% (2,428) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (2,066) | 16.3% (4,813) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chickasha vs Hobart
- In Hobart, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- In Hobart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 22.5% in Chickasha.
- More residents in Chickasha have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 8.2% in Hobart.
- In Hobart, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.