Demographics details for Chickasha, OK vs Glen ellyn, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chickasha, OK vs Glen ellyn, IL.
| Data | Chickasha | Glen ellyn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,549 | 28,364 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 41.6 years |
| Median Income | $55,136 | $128,132 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Chickasha vs Glen ellyn
- The population in Glen ellyn is higher at 28,364, compared to 16,549 in Chickasha.
- The median age in Glen ellyn is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Glen ellyn has a higher median income of $128,132, compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
- In Glen ellyn, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 5% in Glen ellyn.
- Glen ellyn has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Chickasha vs Glen ellyn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chickasha | Glen ellyn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 3 |
| White | 71 | 78 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chickasha vs Glen ellyn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chickasha at 6% compared to 3% in Glen ellyn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Glen ellyn at 78% compared to 71% in Chickasha.
- In Glen ellyn, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Chickasha.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chickasha at 8% compared to 5% in Glen ellyn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chickasha at 11% compared to 5% in Glen ellyn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chickasha at 4% compared to 0% in Glen ellyn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chickasha | Glen ellyn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 11.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 7.4% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 17.3% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 9.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 29.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chickasha vs Glen ellyn
- More residents in Chickasha report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 11.9% in Glen ellyn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chickasha at 25.4% compared to 17.3% in Glen ellyn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chickasha at 21.8% compared to 9.4% in Glen ellyn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Glen ellyn at 17.2% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chickasha at 40.8% compared to 29.2% in Glen ellyn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Glen ellyn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chickasha | Glen ellyn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 0.3% (93) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (3,730) | 6.4% (1,815) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (2,160) | 4.1% (1,149) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (2,066) | 45.8% (12,997) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chickasha vs Glen ellyn
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Glen ellyn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 6.4% in Glen ellyn.
- More residents in Chickasha have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 4.1% in Glen ellyn.
- In Glen ellyn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.8% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.