Demographics details for Chickasha, OK vs Franklin, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chickasha, OK vs Franklin, TX.
| Data | Chickasha | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,549 | 10,618 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 42.9 years |
| Median Income | $55,136 | $67,915 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Chickasha vs Franklin
- In Chickasha, the population is higher at 16,549, compared to 10,618 in Franklin.
- The median age in Franklin is higher at 42.9 years, compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Franklin has a higher median income of $67,915, compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
- In Franklin, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 12% in Franklin.
- Franklin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Chickasha vs Franklin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chickasha | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 4 |
| White | 71 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 12 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chickasha vs Franklin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chickasha at 6% compared to 4% in Franklin.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 69% in Franklin.
- Both Chickasha and Franklin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Franklin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 8% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Franklin at 12%, compared to 11% in Chickasha.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chickasha at 4% compared to 0% in Franklin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chickasha | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 33.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chickasha vs Franklin
- More residents in Chickasha report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.3% in Franklin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chickasha at 25.4% compared to 23.5% in Franklin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chickasha at 21.8% compared to 14.8% in Franklin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Franklin at 19.8% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chickasha at 40.8% compared to 33.2% in Franklin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Franklin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chickasha | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 0.5% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (3,730) | 15.0% (1,588) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (2,160) | 11.3% (1,197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (2,066) | 21.2% (2,251) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chickasha vs Franklin
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Chickasha and Franklin at 0.5%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 15.0% in Franklin.
- More residents in Chickasha have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 11.3% in Franklin.
- In Franklin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.