Demographics details for Chickasha, OK vs Fifield, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chickasha, OK vs Fifield, WI.
| Data | Chickasha | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,549 | 879 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 50.0 years |
| Median Income | $55,136 | $50,000 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Chickasha vs Fifield
- In Chickasha, the population is higher at 16,549, compared to 879 in Fifield.
- The median age in Fifield is higher at 50.0 years, compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher median income of $55,136 compared to $50,000 in Fifield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chickasha at 34.0% compared to 20.0% in Fifield.
- Chickasha has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 10% in Fifield.
- Fifield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Chickasha vs Fifield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chickasha | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 71 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 11 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chickasha vs Fifield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chickasha at 6% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fifield at 100% compared to 71% in Chickasha.
- Both Chickasha and Fifield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chickasha at 8% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chickasha at 11% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chickasha at 4% compared to 0% in Fifield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chickasha | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 25.4% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chickasha vs Fifield
- More residents in Chickasha report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chickasha at 25.4% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chickasha at 21.8% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chickasha at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chickasha at 40.8% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chickasha | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (3,730) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (2,160) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (2,066) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chickasha vs Fifield
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- More residents in Chickasha have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.