Demographics details for Chickasha, OK vs Federal way, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chickasha, OK vs Federal way, WA.
| Data | Chickasha | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,549 | 97,863 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $55,136 | $80,360 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Chickasha vs Federal way
- The population in Federal way is higher at 97,863, compared to 16,549 in Chickasha.
- The median age in Federal way is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Federal way has a higher median income of $80,360, compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
- In Federal way, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 9% in Federal way.
- Federal way has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Chickasha vs Federal way provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chickasha | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 17 |
| White | 71 | 34 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 15 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 14 |
| American Indian | 4 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chickasha vs Federal way
- In Federal way, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 6% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 34% in Federal way.
- In Federal way, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 0% in Chickasha.
- Federal way has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 8% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Federal way at 14%, compared to 11% in Chickasha.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chickasha at 4% compared to 1% in Federal way.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chickasha | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chickasha vs Federal way
- More residents in Chickasha report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.5% in Federal way.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chickasha at 25.4% compared to 24.7% in Federal way.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chickasha at 21.8% compared to 12.7% in Federal way.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Federal way at 16.5% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chickasha at 40.8% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Federal way.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chickasha | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 1.8% (1,735) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (3,730) | 15.3% (15,003) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (2,160) | 11.0% (10,805) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (2,066) | 21.2% (20,761) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chickasha vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 15.3% in Federal way.
- More residents in Chickasha have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 11.0% in Federal way.
- In Federal way, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.