Demographics details for Chickasha, OK vs Cleburne, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chickasha, OK vs Cleburne, TX.
| Data | Chickasha | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,549 | 33,826 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $55,136 | $60,929 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Chickasha vs Cleburne
- The population in Cleburne is higher at 33,826, compared to 16,549 in Chickasha.
- Residents in Chickasha have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher median income of $60,929, compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
- In Cleburne, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 11% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Chickasha vs Cleburne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chickasha | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 6 |
| White | 71 | 52 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
| American Indian | 4 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chickasha vs Cleburne
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Chickasha and Cleburne at 6%.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- In Cleburne, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Chickasha.
- Cleburne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 8% in Chickasha.
- Both Chickasha and Cleburne have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chickasha at 4% compared to 1% in Cleburne.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chickasha | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chickasha vs Cleburne
- More residents in Chickasha report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.6% in Cleburne.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chickasha at 25.4% compared to 23.6% in Cleburne.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chickasha at 21.8% compared to 20.0% in Cleburne.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cleburne at 17.9% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chickasha at 40.8% compared to 37.6% in Cleburne.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Cleburne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chickasha | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 1.4% (471) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (3,730) | 17.8% (6,005) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (2,160) | 17.8% (6,010) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (2,066) | 10.0% (3,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chickasha vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 17.8% in Cleburne.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleburne at 17.8%, compared to 13.1% in Chickasha.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.