Demographics details for Chickasha, OK vs Bagley, IA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chickasha, OK vs Bagley, IA.

Data Chickasha Bagley
Population 16,549 229
Median Age 36.4 years 47.0 years
Median Income $55,136 $43,929
Married Families 34.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 17% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Chickasha vs Bagley

  • In Chickasha, the population is higher at 16,549, compared to 229 in Bagley.
  • The median age in Bagley is higher at 47.0 years, compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
  • Chickasha has a higher median income of $55,136 compared to $43,929 in Bagley.
  • In Bagley, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
  • Chickasha has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 12% in Bagley.
  • Bagley has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.

Demographics

Demographics Chickasha vs Bagley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chickasha Bagley
Black 6 Data is updating
White 71 92
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 8 4
Two or More Races 11 4
American Indian 4 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Chickasha vs Bagley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chickasha at 6% compared to 0% in Bagley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Bagley at 92% compared to 71% in Chickasha.
  • Both Chickasha and Bagley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Chickasha at 8% compared to 4% in Bagley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Chickasha at 11% compared to 4% in Bagley.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chickasha at 4% compared to 0% in Bagley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chickasha Bagley
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 13.7% 9.3%
Depression 25.4% 18.1%
Smoking 21.8% 16.6%
Binge Drinking 13.8% 22.3%
Obesity 40.8% 35.7%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 25.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chickasha vs Bagley

  • More residents in Chickasha report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 14.8% in Bagley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Chickasha at 25.4% compared to 18.1% in Bagley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Chickasha at 21.8% compared to 16.6% in Bagley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Bagley at 22.3% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Chickasha at 40.8% compared to 35.7% in Bagley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bagley at 25.0% compared to 18.0% in Chickasha.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chickasha Bagley
No Schooling 0.5% (78) 0.9% (2)
High School Diploma 22.5% (3,730) 27.5% (63)
Less than High School 13.1% (2,160) 28.8% (66)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.5% (2,066) 8.3% (19)

Education Levels Comparison: Chickasha vs Bagley

  • In Bagley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
  • In Bagley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.5% compared to 22.5% in Chickasha.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bagley at 28.8%, compared to 13.1% in Chickasha.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chickasha hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 8.3% in Bagley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.