Demographics details for Chicago, IL vs Pequot lakes, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chicago, IL vs Pequot lakes, MN.
| Data | Chicago | Pequot lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,665,039 | 2,440 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $71,673 | $73,125 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Chicago vs Pequot lakes
- In Chicago, the population is higher at 2,665,039, compared to 2,440 in Pequot lakes.
- The median age in Pequot lakes is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 35.3 years in Chicago.
- Pequot lakes has a higher median income of $73,125, compared to $71,673 in Chicago.
- In Pequot lakes, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 30.0% in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 9% in Pequot lakes.
- The unemployment rate in Chicago is higher at 7.1%, compared to 3.5% in Pequot lakes.
Demographics
Demographics Chicago vs Pequot lakes provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chicago | Pequot lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 1 |
| White | 23 | 94 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chicago vs Pequot lakes
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chicago at 29% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pequot lakes at 94% compared to 23% in Chicago.
- The Asian population is larger in Chicago at 7% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chicago at 30% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chicago at 10% compared to 2% in Pequot lakes.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chicago and Pequot lakes at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chicago | Pequot lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 30.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chicago vs Pequot lakes
- More residents in Chicago report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 14.4% in Pequot lakes.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pequot lakes at 23.3% versus 16.3% in Chicago.
- Pequot lakes has a higher smoking rate at 15.2% compared to 15.1% in Chicago.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pequot lakes at 19.4% compared to 16.5% in Chicago.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chicago at 34.1% compared to 30.3% in Pequot lakes.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pequot lakes at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Chicago.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chicago | Pequot lakes |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (44,697) | 0.7% (17) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (354,780) | 14.0% (341) |
| Less than High School | 15.8% (419,784) | 3.4% (84) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.4% (811,024) | 20.7% (504) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chicago vs Pequot lakes
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.7% in Pequot lakes.
- In Pequot lakes, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.0% compared to 13.3% in Chicago.
- More residents in Chicago have less than a high school education at 15.8% compared to 3.4% in Pequot lakes.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 20.7% in Pequot lakes.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.