Demographics details for Chicago, IL vs New london, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chicago, IL vs New london, CT.
| Data | Chicago | New london |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,665,039 | 27,980 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 35.5 years |
| Median Income | $71,673 | $56,237 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.1 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Chicago vs New london
- In Chicago, the population is higher at 2,665,039, compared to 27,980 in New london.
- The median age in New london is higher at 35.5 years, compared to 35.3 years in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher median income of $71,673 compared to $56,237 in New london.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chicago at 30.0% compared to 24.0% in New london.
- Chicago has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in New london.
- The unemployment rate in Chicago is higher at 7.1%, compared to 3.6% in New london.
Demographics
Demographics Chicago vs New london provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chicago | New london |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 17 |
| White | 23 | 41 |
| Asian | 7 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chicago vs New london
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chicago at 29% compared to 17% in New london.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New london at 41% compared to 23% in Chicago.
- The Asian population is larger in Chicago at 7% compared to 2% in New london.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chicago at 30% compared to 29% in New london.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New london at 11%, compared to 10% in Chicago.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chicago at 1% compared to 0% in New london.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chicago | New london |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chicago vs New london
- In New london, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.5% in Chicago.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New london at 23.3% versus 16.3% in Chicago.
- New london has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 15.1% in Chicago.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chicago at 16.5% compared to 15.2% in New london.
- New london has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 34.1% in Chicago.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New london at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Chicago.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chicago | New london |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (44,697) | 1.4% (399) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (354,780) | 16.0% (4,487) |
| Less than High School | 15.8% (419,784) | 13.7% (3,830) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.4% (811,024) | 16.9% (4,738) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chicago vs New london
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.4% in New london.
- In New london, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 13.3% in Chicago.
- More residents in Chicago have less than a high school education at 15.8% compared to 13.7% in New london.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 16.9% in New london.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.