Demographics details for Chicago, IL vs Green, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chicago, IL vs Green, OH.
| Data | Chicago | Green |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,665,039 | 27,269 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $71,673 | $90,419 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.1 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Chicago vs Green
- In Chicago, the population is higher at 2,665,039, compared to 27,269 in Green.
- The median age in Green is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 35.3 years in Chicago.
- Green has a higher median income of $90,419, compared to $71,673 in Chicago.
- In Green, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 30.0% in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 4% in Green.
- The unemployment rate in Chicago is higher at 7.1%, compared to 4.7% in Green.
Demographics
Demographics Chicago vs Green provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chicago | Green |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 1 |
| White | 23 | 94 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chicago vs Green
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chicago at 29% compared to 1% in Green.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Green at 94% compared to 23% in Chicago.
- The Asian population is larger in Chicago at 7% compared to 1% in Green.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chicago at 30% compared to 1% in Green.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chicago at 10% compared to 3% in Green.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chicago at 1% compared to 0% in Green.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chicago | Green |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chicago vs Green
- In Green, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.5% in Chicago.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Green at 24.7% versus 16.3% in Chicago.
- Green has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 15.1% in Chicago.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Green at 19.1% compared to 16.5% in Chicago.
- Green has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 34.1% in Chicago.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chicago at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Green.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chicago | Green |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (44,697) | 0.2% (46) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (354,780) | 16.6% (4,514) |
| Less than High School | 15.8% (419,784) | 3.0% (828) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.4% (811,024) | 29.3% (7,977) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chicago vs Green
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.2% in Green.
- In Green, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 13.3% in Chicago.
- More residents in Chicago have less than a high school education at 15.8% compared to 3.0% in Green.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 29.3% in Green.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.