Demographics details for Chicago, IL vs Fairhope, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chicago, IL vs Fairhope, AL.
| Data | Chicago | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,665,039 | 23,859 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 44.9 years |
| Median Income | $71,673 | $85,456 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.1 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Chicago vs Fairhope
- In Chicago, the population is higher at 2,665,039, compared to 23,859 in Fairhope.
- The median age in Fairhope is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 35.3 years in Chicago.
- Fairhope has a higher median income of $85,456, compared to $71,673 in Chicago.
- In Fairhope, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 30.0% in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 8% in Fairhope.
- The unemployment rate in Chicago is higher at 7.1%, compared to 3.4% in Fairhope.
Demographics
Demographics Chicago vs Fairhope provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chicago | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 4 |
| White | 23 | 89 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chicago vs Fairhope
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chicago at 29% compared to 4% in Fairhope.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairhope at 89% compared to 23% in Chicago.
- The Asian population is larger in Chicago at 7% compared to 1% in Fairhope.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chicago at 30% compared to 4% in Fairhope.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chicago at 10% compared to 2% in Fairhope.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chicago at 1% compared to 0% in Fairhope.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chicago | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 12.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 34.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chicago vs Fairhope
- In Fairhope, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 14.5% in Chicago.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairhope at 22.6% versus 16.3% in Chicago.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chicago at 15.1% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairhope at 18.4% compared to 16.5% in Chicago.
- Fairhope has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 34.1% in Chicago.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairhope at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Chicago.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chicago | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (44,697) | 0.3% (75) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (354,780) | 7.1% (1,686) |
| Less than High School | 15.8% (419,784) | 4.6% (1,098) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.4% (811,024) | 35.8% (8,552) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chicago vs Fairhope
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.3% in Fairhope.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago hold a high school diploma at 13.3% compared to 7.1% in Fairhope.
- More residents in Chicago have less than a high school education at 15.8% compared to 4.6% in Fairhope.
- In Fairhope, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 30.4% in Chicago.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.