Demographics details for Chicago, IL vs Central city, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chicago, IL vs Central city, NE.
| Data | Chicago | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,665,039 | 3,078 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $71,673 | $54,063 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.1 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Chicago vs Central city
- In Chicago, the population is higher at 2,665,039, compared to 3,078 in Central city.
- The median age in Central city is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 35.3 years in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher median income of $71,673 compared to $54,063 in Central city.
- In Central city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 30.0% in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 9% in Central city.
- The unemployment rate in Chicago is higher at 7.1%, compared to 2.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Chicago vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chicago | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | Data is updating |
| White | 23 | 86 |
| Asian | 7 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chicago vs Central city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chicago at 29% compared to 0% in Central city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 86% compared to 23% in Chicago.
- The Asian population is larger in Chicago at 7% compared to 3% in Central city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chicago at 30% compared to 7% in Central city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chicago at 10% compared to 4% in Central city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chicago at 1% compared to 0% in Central city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chicago | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 18.6% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chicago vs Central city
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Chicago and Central city at 14.5%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 18.6% versus 16.3% in Chicago.
- Central city has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 15.1% in Chicago.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Central city at 20.0% compared to 16.5% in Chicago.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 34.1% in Chicago.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Chicago.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chicago | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (44,697) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (354,780) | 23.4% (721) |
| Less than High School | 15.8% (419,784) | 5.8% (178) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.4% (811,024) | 13.1% (404) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chicago vs Central city
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Central city.
- In Central city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 13.3% in Chicago.
- More residents in Chicago have less than a high school education at 15.8% compared to 5.8% in Central city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 13.1% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.