Demographics details for Chicago, IL vs Cedar rapids, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chicago, IL vs Cedar rapids, IA.
Data | Chicago | Cedar rapids |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,665,039 | 136,429 |
Median Age | 35.3 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $71,673 | $66,895 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.1 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Chicago vs Cedar rapids
- In Chicago, the population is higher at 2,665,039, compared to 136,429 in Cedar rapids.
- The median age in Cedar rapids is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 35.3 years in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher median income of $71,673 compared to $66,895 in Cedar rapids.
- In Cedar rapids, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 30.0% in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Cedar rapids.
- The unemployment rate in Chicago is higher at 7.1%, compared to 4.3% in Cedar rapids.
Demographics
Demographics Chicago vs Cedar rapids provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chicago | Cedar rapids |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | 9 |
White | 23 | 78 |
Asian | 7 | 3 |
Hispanic | 30 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chicago vs Cedar rapids
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chicago at 29% compared to 9% in Cedar rapids.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar rapids at 78% compared to 23% in Chicago.
- The Asian population is larger in Chicago at 7% compared to 3% in Cedar rapids.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chicago at 30% compared to 4% in Cedar rapids.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chicago at 10% compared to 6% in Cedar rapids.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chicago at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar rapids.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chicago | Cedar rapids |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 9.6% |
Depression | 16.3% | 21.3% |
Smoking | 15.1% | 16.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 22.1% |
Obesity | 34.1% | 39.4% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chicago vs Cedar rapids
- In Cedar rapids, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.5% in Chicago.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar rapids at 21.3% versus 16.3% in Chicago.
- Cedar rapids has a higher smoking rate at 16.9% compared to 15.1% in Chicago.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar rapids at 22.1% compared to 16.5% in Chicago.
- Cedar rapids has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 34.1% in Chicago.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chicago at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar rapids.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chicago | Cedar rapids |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (44,697) | 0.6% (803) |
High School Diploma | 13.3% (354,780) | 14.9% (20,356) |
Less than High School | 15.8% (419,784) | 6.9% (9,473) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.4% (811,024) | 22.3% (30,460) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chicago vs Cedar rapids
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.6% in Cedar rapids.
- In Cedar rapids, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 13.3% in Chicago.
- More residents in Chicago have less than a high school education at 15.8% compared to 6.9% in Cedar rapids.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 22.3% in Cedar rapids.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.