Demographics details for Chicago, IL vs Carrollton, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chicago, IL vs Carrollton, GA.
| Data | Chicago | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,665,039 | 27,262 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 27.5 years |
| Median Income | $71,673 | $46,722 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.1 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Chicago vs Carrollton
- In Chicago, the population is higher at 2,665,039, compared to 27,262 in Carrollton.
- Residents in Chicago have a higher median age of 35.3 years compared to 27.5 years in Carrollton.
- Chicago has a higher median income of $71,673 compared to $46,722 in Carrollton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chicago at 30.0% compared to 27.0% in Carrollton.
- Chicago has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 15% in Carrollton.
- The unemployment rate in Chicago is higher at 7.1%, compared to 5.4% in Carrollton.
Demographics
Demographics Chicago vs Carrollton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chicago | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 36 |
| White | 23 | 47 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Chicago vs Carrollton
- In Carrollton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 36% compared to 29% in Chicago.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carrollton at 47% compared to 23% in Chicago.
- The Asian population is larger in Chicago at 7% compared to 1% in Carrollton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chicago at 30% compared to 9% in Carrollton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chicago at 10% compared to 5% in Carrollton.
- In Carrollton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Chicago.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chicago | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chicago vs Carrollton
- In Carrollton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 14.5% in Chicago.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carrollton at 20.9% versus 16.3% in Chicago.
- Carrollton has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 15.1% in Chicago.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chicago at 16.5% compared to 14.7% in Carrollton.
- Carrollton has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 34.1% in Chicago.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carrollton at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Chicago.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chicago | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (44,697) | 0.8% (212) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (354,780) | 12.6% (3,426) |
| Less than High School | 15.8% (419,784) | 11.5% (3,126) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.4% (811,024) | 16.9% (4,617) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chicago vs Carrollton
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.8% in Carrollton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago hold a high school diploma at 13.3% compared to 12.6% in Carrollton.
- More residents in Chicago have less than a high school education at 15.8% compared to 11.5% in Carrollton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 16.9% in Carrollton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.