Demographics details for Chester, IL vs Young harris, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chester, IL vs Young harris, GA.
Data | Chester | Young harris |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,782 | 810 |
Median Age | 43.2 years | 20.4 years |
Median Income | $68,826 | $27,500 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 19.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Chester vs Young harris
- In Chester, the population is higher at 6,782, compared to 810 in Young harris.
- Residents in Chester have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 20.4 years in Young harris.
- Chester has a higher median income of $68,826 compared to $27,500 in Young harris.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chester at 29.0% compared to 19.0% in Young harris.
- Chester has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Young harris.
- The unemployment rate in Chester is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Young harris.
Demographics
Demographics Chester vs Young harris provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chester | Young harris |
---|---|---|
Black | 27 | 14 |
White | 66 | 70 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Chester vs Young harris
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chester at 27% compared to 14% in Young harris.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Young harris at 70% compared to 66% in Chester.
- Both Chester and Young harris have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Young harris has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 5% in Chester.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Young harris at 3%, compared to 2% in Chester.
- In Young harris, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Chester.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chester | Young harris |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 12.0% |
Depression | 18.6% | 23.4% |
Smoking | 22.6% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 40.8% | 33.5% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chester vs Young harris
- In Young harris, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 16.3% in Chester.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Young harris at 23.4% versus 18.6% in Chester.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chester at 22.6% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chester at 17.6% compared to 16.9% in Young harris.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chester at 40.8% compared to 33.5% in Young harris.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Young harris at 23.0% compared to 15.0% in Chester.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chester | Young harris |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (97) | 0.2% (2) |
High School Diploma | 23.9% (1,620) | 5.7% (46) |
Less than High School | 35.1% (2,380) | 4.4% (36) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.6% (447) | 9.3% (75) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chester vs Young harris
- A higher percentage of residents in Chester have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.2% in Young harris.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chester hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 5.7% in Young harris.
- More residents in Chester have less than a high school education at 35.1% compared to 4.4% in Young harris.
- In Young harris, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 6.6% in Chester.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.