Demographics details for Chesnee, SC vs Helper, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesnee, SC vs Helper, UT.
| Data | Chesnee | Helper |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 878 | 2,131 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 43.2 years |
| Median Income | $42,727 | $59,323 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 61.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Chesnee vs Helper
- The population in Helper is higher at 2,131, compared to 878 in Chesnee.
- The median age in Helper is higher at 43.2 years, compared to 38.8 years in Chesnee.
- Helper has a higher median income of $59,323, compared to $42,727 in Chesnee.
- In Helper, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 20.0% in Chesnee.
- The poverty level is higher in Helper at 11%, compared to 10% in Chesnee.
- The unemployment rate in Chesnee is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.5% in Helper.
Demographics
Demographics Chesnee vs Helper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chesnee | Helper |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | Data is updating |
| White | 85 | 85 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chesnee vs Helper
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesnee at 11% compared to 0% in Helper.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Chesnee and Helper at 85%.
- Both Chesnee and Helper have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Helper has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 3% in Chesnee.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Helper at 5%, compared to 1% in Chesnee.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chesnee and Helper at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chesnee | Helper |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.4% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 25.0% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 39.6% | 36.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesnee vs Helper
- More residents in Chesnee report poor mental health at 21.4% compared to 17.1% in Helper.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chesnee at 26.3% compared to 25.3% in Helper.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chesnee at 25.0% compared to 11.5% in Helper.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chesnee at 14.3% compared to 14.2% in Helper.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chesnee at 39.6% compared to 36.9% in Helper.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Helper at 26.0% compared to 18.0% in Chesnee.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chesnee | Helper |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (6) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (123) | 23.4% (499) |
| Less than High School | 14.9% (131) | 8.7% (185) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (70) | 18.7% (399) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesnee vs Helper
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesnee have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Helper.
- In Helper, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 14.0% in Chesnee.
- More residents in Chesnee have less than a high school education at 14.9% compared to 8.7% in Helper.
- In Helper, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 8.0% in Chesnee.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.