Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Woods hole, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Woods hole, MA.

Data Chesapeake Woods hole
Population 252,488 992
Median Age 37.4 years 65.8 years
Median Income $92,703 $72,031
Married Families 43.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 8% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Woods hole

  • In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 992 in Woods hole.
  • The median age in Woods hole is higher at 65.8 years, compared to 37.4 years in Chesapeake.
  • Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703 compared to $72,031 in Woods hole.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Chesapeake at 43.0% compared to 36.0% in Woods hole.
  • Chesapeake has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Woods hole.
  • Woods hole has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.

Demographics

Demographics Chesapeake vs Woods hole provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chesapeake Woods hole
Black 29 Data is updating
White 53 96
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 7 Data is updating
Two or More Races 7 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Woods hole

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesapeake at 29% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Woods hole at 96% compared to 53% in Chesapeake.
  • The Asian population is larger in Chesapeake at 4% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Chesapeake at 7% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Chesapeake at 7% compared to 4% in Woods hole.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chesapeake and Woods hole at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chesapeake Woods hole
Mental Health Not Good 15.9% 13.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.0% 7.3%
Depression 20.9% 21.5%
Smoking 14.8% 9.5%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 19.3%
Obesity 36.1% 26.0%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Woods hole

  • More residents in Chesapeake report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 13.8% in Woods hole.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Woods hole at 21.5% versus 20.9% in Chesapeake.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 14.8% compared to 9.5% in Woods hole.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Woods hole at 19.3% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Chesapeake at 36.1% compared to 26.0% in Woods hole.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woods hole at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Chesapeake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chesapeake Woods hole
No Schooling 0.8% (2,039) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 13.1% (33,024) 7.4% (73)
Less than High School 7.0% (17,684) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.8% (60,160) 67.2% (667)

Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Woods hole

  • A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 7.4% in Woods hole.
  • More residents in Chesapeake have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
  • In Woods hole, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 67.2% compared to 23.8% in Chesapeake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.