Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Winger, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Winger, MN.
| Data | Chesapeake | Winger |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 252,488 | 173 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 48.8 years |
| Median Income | $92,703 | $42,500 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Winger
- In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 173 in Winger.
- The median age in Winger is higher at 48.8 years, compared to 37.4 years in Chesapeake.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703 compared to $42,500 in Winger.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chesapeake at 43.0% compared to 37.0% in Winger.
- Chesapeake has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Winger.
- Winger has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Chesapeake vs Winger provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chesapeake | Winger |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | Data is updating |
| White | 53 | 88 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Winger
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesapeake at 29% compared to 0% in Winger.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Winger at 88% compared to 53% in Chesapeake.
- The Asian population is larger in Chesapeake at 4% compared to 1% in Winger.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chesapeake at 7% compared to 0% in Winger.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Winger at 10%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- In Winger, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Chesapeake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chesapeake | Winger |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 21.9% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Winger
- More residents in Chesapeake report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 15.5% in Winger.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Winger at 24.3% versus 20.9% in Chesapeake.
- Winger has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 14.8% in Chesapeake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Winger at 21.9% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
- Winger has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 36.1% in Chesapeake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Winger at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Chesapeake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chesapeake | Winger |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,039) | 2.3% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (33,024) | 14.5% (25) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (17,684) | 20.2% (35) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (60,160) | 12.7% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Winger
- In Winger, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.8% in Chesapeake.
- In Winger, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.5% compared to 13.1% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Winger at 20.2%, compared to 7.0% in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 12.7% in Winger.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.