Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Tuscumbia, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Tuscumbia, MO.
| Data | Chesapeake | Tuscumbia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 252,488 | 190 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $92,703 | $44,375 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 21.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Tuscumbia
- In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 190 in Tuscumbia.
- The median age in Tuscumbia is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 37.4 years in Chesapeake.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703 compared to $44,375 in Tuscumbia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chesapeake at 43.0% compared to 21.0% in Tuscumbia.
- The poverty level is higher in Tuscumbia at 10%, compared to 8% in Chesapeake.
- Tuscumbia has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Chesapeake vs Tuscumbia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chesapeake | Tuscumbia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 17 |
| White | 53 | 78 |
| Asian | 4 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Tuscumbia
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesapeake at 29% compared to 17% in Tuscumbia.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tuscumbia at 78% compared to 53% in Chesapeake.
- The Asian population is larger in Chesapeake at 4% compared to 2% in Tuscumbia.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chesapeake at 7% compared to 3% in Tuscumbia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chesapeake at 7% compared to 0% in Tuscumbia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chesapeake and Tuscumbia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chesapeake | Tuscumbia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 22.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Tuscumbia
- In Tuscumbia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.9% in Chesapeake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tuscumbia at 22.2% versus 20.9% in Chesapeake.
- Tuscumbia has a higher smoking rate at 22.5% compared to 14.8% in Chesapeake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tuscumbia at 19.5% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
- Tuscumbia has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 36.1% in Chesapeake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chesapeake at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Tuscumbia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chesapeake | Tuscumbia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,039) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (33,024) | 17.4% (33) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (17,684) | 18.9% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (60,160) | 4.7% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Tuscumbia
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Tuscumbia.
- In Tuscumbia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.4% compared to 13.1% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tuscumbia at 18.9%, compared to 7.0% in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 4.7% in Tuscumbia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.