Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Stoughton, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Stoughton, WI.
Data | Chesapeake | Stoughton |
---|---|---|
Population | 252,488 | 12,846 |
Median Age | 37.4 years | 41.6 years |
Median Income | $92,703 | $73,014 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Stoughton
- In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 12,846 in Stoughton.
- The median age in Stoughton is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 37.4 years in Chesapeake.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703 compared to $73,014 in Stoughton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chesapeake at 43.0% compared to 40.0% in Stoughton.
- The poverty level is higher in Stoughton at 9%, compared to 8% in Chesapeake.
- Stoughton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Chesapeake vs Stoughton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chesapeake | Stoughton |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | 1 |
White | 53 | 93 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Stoughton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesapeake at 29% compared to 1% in Stoughton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stoughton at 93% compared to 53% in Chesapeake.
- The Asian population is larger in Chesapeake at 4% compared to 0% in Stoughton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chesapeake at 7% compared to 3% in Stoughton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chesapeake at 7% compared to 3% in Stoughton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chesapeake and Stoughton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chesapeake | Stoughton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 8.7% |
Depression | 20.9% | 24.8% |
Smoking | 14.8% | 13.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 24.5% |
Obesity | 36.1% | 28.8% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Stoughton
- More residents in Chesapeake report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 14.4% in Stoughton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stoughton at 24.8% versus 20.9% in Chesapeake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 14.8% compared to 13.8% in Stoughton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Stoughton at 24.5% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chesapeake at 36.1% compared to 28.8% in Stoughton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stoughton at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Chesapeake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chesapeake | Stoughton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (2,039) | 0.4% (51) |
High School Diploma | 13.1% (33,024) | 14.4% (1,850) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (17,684) | 7.6% (981) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (60,160) | 25.2% (3,241) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Stoughton
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Stoughton.
- In Stoughton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.4% compared to 13.1% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stoughton at 7.6%, compared to 7.0% in Chesapeake.
- In Stoughton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.2% compared to 23.8% in Chesapeake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.