Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Smyrna, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Smyrna, GA.
| Data | Chesapeake | Smyrna |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 252,488 | 56,160 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $92,703 | $92,258 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Smyrna
- In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 56,160 in Smyrna.
- Residents in Chesapeake have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 35.6 years in Smyrna.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703 compared to $92,258 in Smyrna.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chesapeake at 43.0% compared to 37.0% in Smyrna.
- The poverty level is identical in both Chesapeake and Smyrna at 8%.
- Smyrna has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Chesapeake vs Smyrna provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chesapeake | Smyrna |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 33 |
| White | 53 | 40 |
| Asian | 4 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Smyrna
- In Smyrna, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 33% compared to 29% in Chesapeake.
- Chesapeake has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 40% in Smyrna.
- In Smyrna, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 4% in Chesapeake.
- Smyrna has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- Both Chesapeake and Smyrna have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- In Smyrna, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Chesapeake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chesapeake | Smyrna |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 17.4% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 11.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 30.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Smyrna
- More residents in Chesapeake report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 13.8% in Smyrna.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 20.9% compared to 17.4% in Smyrna.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 14.8% compared to 11.9% in Smyrna.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chesapeake at 16.1% compared to 14.9% in Smyrna.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chesapeake at 36.1% compared to 30.0% in Smyrna.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chesapeake at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Smyrna.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chesapeake | Smyrna |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,039) | 0.4% (203) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (33,024) | 7.8% (4,397) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (17,684) | 5.6% (3,139) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (60,160) | 41.0% (23,025) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Smyrna
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Smyrna.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 7.8% in Smyrna.
- More residents in Chesapeake have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 5.6% in Smyrna.
- In Smyrna, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.0% compared to 23.8% in Chesapeake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.