Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Selma, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Selma, OR.
Data | Chesapeake | Selma |
---|---|---|
Population | 252,488 | 892 |
Median Age | 37.4 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $92,703 | $42,319 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 54.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Selma
- In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 892 in Selma.
- Residents in Chesapeake have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 36.6 years in Selma.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703 compared to $42,319 in Selma.
- In Selma, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 43.0% in Chesapeake.
- The poverty level is higher in Selma at 13%, compared to 8% in Chesapeake.
- Selma has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Chesapeake vs Selma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chesapeake | Selma |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | Data is updating |
White | 53 | 95 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Selma
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesapeake at 29% compared to 0% in Selma.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Selma at 95% compared to 53% in Chesapeake.
- The Asian population is larger in Chesapeake at 4% compared to 0% in Selma.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chesapeake at 7% compared to 1% in Selma.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chesapeake at 7% compared to 4% in Selma.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chesapeake and Selma at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chesapeake | Selma |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 11.6% |
Depression | 20.9% | 26.9% |
Smoking | 14.8% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 36.1% | 30.7% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Selma
- In Selma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.9% in Chesapeake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Selma at 26.9% versus 20.9% in Chesapeake.
- Selma has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 14.8% in Chesapeake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Selma at 18.4% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chesapeake at 36.1% compared to 30.7% in Selma.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Selma at 28.0% compared to 11.0% in Chesapeake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chesapeake | Selma |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (2,039) | 1.5% (13) |
High School Diploma | 13.1% (33,024) | 15.9% (142) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (17,684) | 8.3% (74) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (60,160) | 1.7% (15) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Selma
- In Selma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.8% in Chesapeake.
- In Selma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.9% compared to 13.1% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Selma at 8.3%, compared to 7.0% in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 1.7% in Selma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.