Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Rutherford, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Rutherford, NJ.
| Data | Chesapeake | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 252,488 | 18,662 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $92,703 | $128,576 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Rutherford
- In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 18,662 in Rutherford.
- The median age in Rutherford is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 37.4 years in Chesapeake.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576, compared to $92,703 in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chesapeake at 43.0% compared to 42.0% in Rutherford.
- The poverty level is higher in Rutherford at 9%, compared to 8% in Chesapeake.
- Rutherford has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Chesapeake vs Rutherford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chesapeake | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 3 |
| White | 53 | 49 |
| Asian | 4 | 16 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Rutherford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesapeake at 29% compared to 3% in Rutherford.
- Chesapeake has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
- In Rutherford, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 4% in Chesapeake.
- Rutherford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rutherford at 11%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chesapeake and Rutherford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chesapeake | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 7.8% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 10.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 24.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Rutherford
- More residents in Chesapeake report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 20.9% compared to 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 14.8% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rutherford at 17.6% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chesapeake at 36.1% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chesapeake at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chesapeake | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,039) | 0.9% (161) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (33,024) | 12.4% (2,318) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (17,684) | 6.3% (1,175) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (60,160) | 38.9% (7,259) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Rutherford
- In Rutherford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- More residents in Chesapeake have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- In Rutherford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 23.8% in Chesapeake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.