Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Pittsfield, NH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Pittsfield, NH.

Data Chesapeake Pittsfield
Population 252,488 4,140
Median Age 37.4 years 42.0 years
Median Income $92,703 $64,600
Married Families 43.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 8% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 2.6

Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Pittsfield

  • In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 4,140 in Pittsfield.
  • The median age in Pittsfield is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 37.4 years in Chesapeake.
  • Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703 compared to $64,600 in Pittsfield.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Chesapeake at 43.0% compared to 33.0% in Pittsfield.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Chesapeake and Pittsfield at 8%.
  • The unemployment rate in Chesapeake is higher at 3.0%, compared to 2.6% in Pittsfield.

Demographics

Demographics Chesapeake vs Pittsfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chesapeake Pittsfield
Black 29 Data is updating
White 53 100
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 7 Data is updating
Two or More Races 7 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Pittsfield

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesapeake at 29% compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pittsfield at 100% compared to 53% in Chesapeake.
  • The Asian population is larger in Chesapeake at 4% compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Chesapeake at 7% compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Chesapeake at 7% compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chesapeake and Pittsfield at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chesapeake Pittsfield
Mental Health Not Good 15.9% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 10.0% Data is updating%
Depression 20.9% Data is updating%
Smoking 14.8% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.1% Data is updating%
Obesity 36.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 11.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Pittsfield

  • More residents in Chesapeake report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 20.9% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Chesapeake at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Chesapeake at 36.1% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Chesapeake at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chesapeake Pittsfield
No Schooling 0.8% (2,039) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 13.1% (33,024) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 7.0% (17,684) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.8% (60,160) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Pittsfield

  • A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • More residents in Chesapeake have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.