Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Pickrell, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Pickrell, NE.
| Data | Chesapeake | Pickrell |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 252,488 | 183 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $92,703 | $67,917 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 61.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Pickrell
- In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 183 in Pickrell.
- The median age in Pickrell is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 37.4 years in Chesapeake.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703 compared to $67,917 in Pickrell.
- In Pickrell, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 43.0% in Chesapeake.
- Chesapeake has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Pickrell.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Chesapeake and Pickrell at 3.0%.
Demographics
Demographics Chesapeake vs Pickrell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chesapeake | Pickrell |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | Data is updating |
| White | 53 | 92 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Pickrell
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesapeake at 29% compared to 0% in Pickrell.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pickrell at 92% compared to 53% in Chesapeake.
- The Asian population is larger in Chesapeake at 4% compared to 0% in Pickrell.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chesapeake at 7% compared to 6% in Pickrell.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chesapeake at 7% compared to 1% in Pickrell.
- In Pickrell, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Chesapeake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chesapeake | Pickrell |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 18.2% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 22.3% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Pickrell
- More residents in Chesapeake report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 13.1% in Pickrell.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 20.9% compared to 18.2% in Pickrell.
- Pickrell has a higher smoking rate at 15.3% compared to 14.8% in Chesapeake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pickrell at 22.3% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
- Pickrell has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 36.1% in Chesapeake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pickrell at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Chesapeake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chesapeake | Pickrell |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,039) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (33,024) | 26.2% (48) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (17,684) | 4.4% (8) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (60,160) | 15.8% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Pickrell
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Pickrell.
- In Pickrell, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.2% compared to 13.1% in Chesapeake.
- More residents in Chesapeake have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 4.4% in Pickrell.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 15.8% in Pickrell.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.