Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Peoria, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Peoria, AZ.
| Data | Chesapeake | Peoria |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 252,488 | 197,866 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 41.4 years |
| Median Income | $92,703 | $86,759 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Peoria
- In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 197,866 in Peoria.
- The median age in Peoria is higher at 41.4 years, compared to 37.4 years in Chesapeake.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703 compared to $86,759 in Peoria.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Chesapeake and Peoria at 43.0%.
- The poverty level is identical in both Chesapeake and Peoria at 8%.
- Peoria has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Chesapeake vs Peoria provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chesapeake | Peoria |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 3 |
| White | 53 | 60 |
| Asian | 4 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Peoria
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesapeake at 29% compared to 3% in Peoria.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Peoria at 60% compared to 53% in Chesapeake.
- In Peoria, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 4% in Chesapeake.
- Peoria has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Peoria at 10%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- In Peoria, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Chesapeake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chesapeake | Peoria |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 29.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Peoria
- In Peoria, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.9% in Chesapeake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 20.9% compared to 19.9% in Peoria.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 14.8% compared to 13.5% in Peoria.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Peoria at 18.7% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chesapeake at 36.1% compared to 29.3% in Peoria.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Peoria at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Chesapeake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chesapeake | Peoria |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,039) | 1.1% (2,127) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (33,024) | 12.9% (25,582) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (17,684) | 9.3% (18,494) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (60,160) | 23.6% (46,719) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Peoria
- In Peoria, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.8% in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 12.9% in Peoria.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Peoria at 9.3%, compared to 7.0% in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 23.6% in Peoria.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.