Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Luling, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Luling, TX.
| Data | Chesapeake | Luling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 252,488 | 5,545 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 50.3 years |
| Median Income | $92,703 | $59,773 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Luling
- In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 5,545 in Luling.
- The median age in Luling is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 37.4 years in Chesapeake.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703 compared to $59,773 in Luling.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Chesapeake and Luling at 43.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Luling at 12%, compared to 8% in Chesapeake.
- Luling has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Chesapeake vs Luling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chesapeake | Luling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 8 |
| White | 53 | 12 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 54 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 25 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Luling
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesapeake at 29% compared to 8% in Luling.
- Chesapeake has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 12% in Luling.
- The Asian population is larger in Chesapeake at 4% compared to 1% in Luling.
- Luling has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Luling at 25%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chesapeake and Luling at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chesapeake | Luling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 15.4% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 43.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Luling
- In Luling, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 15.9% in Chesapeake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Luling at 23.2% versus 20.9% in Chesapeake.
- Luling has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 14.8% in Chesapeake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chesapeake at 16.1% compared to 15.6% in Luling.
- Luling has higher obesity rates at 43.9% compared to 36.1% in Chesapeake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Luling at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Chesapeake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chesapeake | Luling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,039) | 3.9% (214) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (33,024) | 25.5% (1,415) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (17,684) | 39.5% (2,189) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (60,160) | 10.1% (560) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Luling
- In Luling, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 0.8% in Chesapeake.
- In Luling, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.5% compared to 13.1% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Luling at 39.5%, compared to 7.0% in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 10.1% in Luling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.