Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Lexington, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Lexington, NE.
| Data | Chesapeake | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 252,488 | 10,725 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 30.0 years |
| Median Income | $92,703 | $63,939 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Lexington
- In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 10,725 in Lexington.
- Residents in Chesapeake have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 30.0 years in Lexington.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703 compared to $63,939 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chesapeake at 43.0% compared to 35.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 9%, compared to 8% in Chesapeake.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Chesapeake vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chesapeake | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 15 |
| White | 53 | 4 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 64 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Lexington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesapeake at 29% compared to 15% in Lexington.
- Chesapeake has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 4% in Lexington.
- The Asian population is larger in Chesapeake at 4% compared to 1% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- In Lexington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Chesapeake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chesapeake | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 13.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 16.2% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 45.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Lexington
- More residents in Chesapeake report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 20.9% compared to 16.2% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 14.8% in Chesapeake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lexington at 18.1% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 45.1% compared to 36.1% in Chesapeake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chesapeake at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chesapeake | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,039) | 6.2% (660) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (33,024) | 13.6% (1,463) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (17,684) | 36.3% (3,892) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (60,160) | 7.3% (779) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.8% in Chesapeake.
- In Lexington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.6% compared to 13.1% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 36.3%, compared to 7.0% in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 7.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.