Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Junction city, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Junction city, KS.
| Data | Chesapeake | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 252,488 | 22,264 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 28.5 years |
| Median Income | $92,703 | $60,709 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Junction city
- In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 22,264 in Junction city.
- Residents in Chesapeake have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703 compared to $60,709 in Junction city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chesapeake at 43.0% compared to 40.0% in Junction city.
- The poverty level is higher in Junction city at 13%, compared to 8% in Chesapeake.
- Junction city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Chesapeake vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chesapeake | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 20 |
| White | 53 | 43 |
| Asian | 4 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Junction city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesapeake at 29% compared to 20% in Junction city.
- Chesapeake has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 43% in Junction city.
- The Asian population is larger in Chesapeake at 4% compared to 3% in Junction city.
- Junction city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- In Junction city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Chesapeake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chesapeake | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Junction city
- In Junction city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.9% in Chesapeake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 20.9% compared to 19.2% in Junction city.
- Junction city has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 14.8% in Chesapeake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Junction city at 16.6% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
- Junction city has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 36.1% in Chesapeake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Junction city at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Chesapeake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chesapeake | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,039) | 1.0% (216) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (33,024) | 12.4% (2,755) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (17,684) | 6.9% (1,535) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (60,160) | 13.2% (2,941) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Junction city
- In Junction city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
- More residents in Chesapeake have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 13.2% in Junction city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.