Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Gillette, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Gillette, NJ.
| Data | Chesapeake | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 252,488 | 3,251 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 41.0 years |
| Median Income | $92,703 | $145,000 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 62.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Gillette
- In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 3,251 in Gillette.
- The median age in Gillette is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 37.4 years in Chesapeake.
- Gillette has a higher median income of $145,000, compared to $92,703 in Chesapeake.
- In Gillette, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 43.0% in Chesapeake.
- Chesapeake has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 2% in Gillette.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Chesapeake and Gillette at 3.0%.
Demographics
Demographics Chesapeake vs Gillette provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chesapeake | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 1 |
| White | 53 | 90 |
| Asian | 4 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Gillette
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesapeake at 29% compared to 1% in Gillette.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gillette at 90% compared to 53% in Chesapeake.
- Both Chesapeake and Gillette have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chesapeake at 7% compared to 2% in Gillette.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chesapeake at 7% compared to 3% in Gillette.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chesapeake and Gillette at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chesapeake | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 20.9% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Gillette
- More residents in Chesapeake report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 20.9% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chesapeake at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chesapeake at 36.1% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chesapeake at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chesapeake | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,039) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (33,024) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (17,684) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (60,160) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Gillette
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- More residents in Chesapeake have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.