Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Fullerton, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Fullerton, CA.
| Data | Chesapeake | Fullerton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 252,488 | 140,541 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 35.5 years |
| Median Income | $92,703 | $99,279 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Fullerton
- In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 140,541 in Fullerton.
- Residents in Chesapeake have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 35.5 years in Fullerton.
- Fullerton has a higher median income of $99,279, compared to $92,703 in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chesapeake at 43.0% compared to 40.0% in Fullerton.
- The poverty level is higher in Fullerton at 12%, compared to 8% in Chesapeake.
- Fullerton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Chesapeake vs Fullerton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chesapeake | Fullerton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 2 |
| White | 53 | 22 |
| Asian | 4 | 25 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 38 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Fullerton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesapeake at 29% compared to 2% in Fullerton.
- Chesapeake has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 22% in Fullerton.
- In Fullerton, the Asian population stands at 25%, greater than 4% in Chesapeake.
- Fullerton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 38%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fullerton at 12%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- In Fullerton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Chesapeake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chesapeake | Fullerton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 10.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 25.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Fullerton
- More residents in Chesapeake report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 14.4% in Fullerton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 20.9% compared to 16.8% in Fullerton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 14.8% compared to 10.1% in Fullerton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chesapeake at 16.1% compared to 15.5% in Fullerton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chesapeake at 36.1% compared to 25.7% in Fullerton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chesapeake at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Fullerton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chesapeake | Fullerton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,039) | 1.6% (2,259) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (33,024) | 10.0% (13,991) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (17,684) | 13.2% (18,547) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (60,160) | 29.7% (41,772) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Fullerton
- In Fullerton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.8% in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 10.0% in Fullerton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fullerton at 13.2%, compared to 7.0% in Chesapeake.
- In Fullerton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.7% compared to 23.8% in Chesapeake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.