Demographics details for Chesapeake, VA vs Danbury, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chesapeake, VA vs Danbury, CT.
| Data | Chesapeake | Danbury |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 252,488 | 86,967 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $92,703 | $79,983 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 2.4 |
Population Comparison: Chesapeake vs Danbury
- In Chesapeake, the population is higher at 252,488, compared to 86,967 in Danbury.
- The median age in Danbury is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 37.4 years in Chesapeake.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703 compared to $79,983 in Danbury.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chesapeake at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Danbury.
- The poverty level is higher in Danbury at 9%, compared to 8% in Chesapeake.
- The unemployment rate in Chesapeake is higher at 3.0%, compared to 2.4% in Danbury.
Demographics
Demographics Chesapeake vs Danbury provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chesapeake | Danbury |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 13 |
| White | 53 | 38 |
| Asian | 4 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 32 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Danbury
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chesapeake at 29% compared to 13% in Danbury.
- Chesapeake has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 38% in Danbury.
- In Danbury, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 4% in Chesapeake.
- Danbury has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Danbury at 12%, compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chesapeake and Danbury at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chesapeake | Danbury |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 14.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 26.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chesapeake vs Danbury
- More residents in Chesapeake report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 15.1% in Danbury.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 20.9% compared to 18.8% in Danbury.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chesapeake at 14.8% compared to 14.2% in Danbury.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Danbury at 16.2% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chesapeake at 36.1% compared to 26.0% in Danbury.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chesapeake at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Danbury.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chesapeake | Danbury |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,039) | 2.0% (1,713) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (33,024) | 15.7% (13,686) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (17,684) | 19.6% (17,043) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (60,160) | 23.0% (19,982) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chesapeake vs Danbury
- In Danbury, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.8% in Chesapeake.
- In Danbury, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.7% compared to 13.1% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Danbury at 19.6%, compared to 7.0% in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chesapeake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 23.0% in Danbury.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.