Demographics details for Cherokee, OK vs Orland park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cherokee, OK vs Orland park, IL.
| Data | Cherokee | Orland park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,098 | 57,511 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 46.6 years |
| Median Income | $52,410 | $97,365 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Cherokee vs Orland park
- The population in Orland park is higher at 57,511, compared to 48,098 in Cherokee.
- The median age in Orland park is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 36.5 years in Cherokee.
- Orland park has a higher median income of $97,365, compared to $52,410 in Cherokee.
- In Orland park, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 38.0% in Cherokee.
- Cherokee has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 6% in Orland park.
- Orland park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 4.6% in Cherokee.
Demographics
Demographics Cherokee vs Orland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cherokee | Orland park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 42 | 76 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 5 |
| American Indian | 33 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cherokee vs Orland park
- In Orland park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Cherokee.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Orland park at 76% compared to 42% in Cherokee.
- In Orland park, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Cherokee.
- Orland park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 8% in Cherokee.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cherokee at 15% compared to 5% in Orland park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cherokee at 33% compared to 0% in Orland park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cherokee | Orland park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 18.2% |
| Smoking | 23.2% | 11.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 43.7% | 26.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cherokee vs Orland park
- More residents in Cherokee report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 13.2% in Orland park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cherokee at 26.6% compared to 18.2% in Orland park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cherokee at 23.2% compared to 11.7% in Orland park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Orland park at 20.2% compared to 13.8% in Cherokee.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cherokee at 43.7% compared to 26.8% in Orland park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cherokee at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Orland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cherokee | Orland park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (433) | 0.5% (297) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (7,526) | 16.1% (9,262) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (5,552) | 8.3% (4,763) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.9% (8,612) | 31.9% (18,372) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cherokee vs Orland park
- A higher percentage of residents in Cherokee have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Orland park.
- In Orland park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 15.6% in Cherokee.
- More residents in Cherokee have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 8.3% in Orland park.
- In Orland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.9% compared to 17.9% in Cherokee.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.